The Human Development Index - going beyond income |
|
Each year since 1990 the Human Development Report has publishedthe
human development index (HDI) that looks beyond GDP to a broaderdefinition
of well-being. The HDI provides a composite measureof three dimensions of
human development: living a long and healthylife (measured by life
expectancy), being educated (measured byadult literacy and enrolment at
the primary, secondary and tertiarylevel) and having a decent standard of
living (measured by purchasingpower parity, PPP, income). The index is not
in any sense a comprehensive measure of human development. It does not,
for example, include important indicators such as inequality and difficult
to measure indicators like respect for human rights and political
freedoms. What it does provide is a broadened prism forviewing human
progress and the complex relationship between incomeand well-being.
The HDI for Ethiopia is 0.371, which gives Ethiopia a rank of170th out
of 177 countries with data (Table 1).
| Table 1: Ethiopia’s human developmentindex
2004 |
| HDI value |
Life expectancy at birth
(years) |
Combined primary, secondary and
tertiary gross enrolment ratio (%) |
GDP per capita (PPP US$) |
| 1. Norway (0.965) |
| 168. Mozambique (0.390) |
| 169. Burundi (0.384) |
| 170. Ethiopia
(0.371) |
| 171. Chad (0.368) |
| 172. Central African Republic
(0.353) | |
| 1. Japan (82.2) |
| 151. Mali (48.1) |
| 152. Burkina Faso (47.9) |
| 153. Ethiopia
(47.8) |
| 154. Kenya (47.5) |
| 155. Namibia
(47.2) | |
| 1. Australia (113.2) |
| 161. Guinea-Bissau (36.7) |
| 162. Burundi (36.2) |
| 163. Ethiopia
(36.0) |
| 164. Eritrea (35.1) |
| 165. Mali (35.0) | |
| 1. Luxembourg (69,961) |
| 164. Madagascar (857) |
| 165. Niger (779) |
| 166. Ethiopia
(756) |
| 167. Guinea-Bissau (722) |
| 168. Congo, Dem. Rep. of the
(705) | |
| 177. Niger (0.311) |
177. Swaziland (31.3) |
172. Niger (21.5) |
172. Sierra Leone
(561) |
|
This year’s HDI, which refers to 2004, highlights the very
largegaps in well-being and life chances that continue to divide
ourincreasingly interconnected world. By looking at some of the
mostfundamental aspects of people’s lives and opportunities it
providesa much more complete picture of a country’s development than
otherindicators, such as GDP per capita. Figure 1 illustrates
thatcountries on the same level of HDI as Ethiopia can have very
differentlevels of income and life expectancy.
Human development index trends tell an important story. Sincethe
mid-1970s almost all regions have been progressively increasingtheir
HDI score (Figure 2). East Asia and South Asia have
acceleratedprogress since 1990. Central and Eastern Europe and the
Commonwealthof Independent States (CIS), following a catastrophic
declinein the first half of the 1990s, has also recovered to the
level before the reversal. The major exception isSub-Saharan Africa.
Since 1990 it has stagnated, partly becauseof economic reversal but
principally because of the catastrophiceffect of HIV/AIDS on life
expectancy. |
Figure 1: The human development
index gives a more complete picture than
income
 | |
Human poverty in Ethiopia: focusing on the most deprived in
multipledimensions of poverty
|
The HDI measures the average progress of a country in
humandevelopment. The Human Poverty Index for developing
countries(HPI-1), focuses on the proportion of people below a
thresholdlevel in the same dimensions of human development as the
humandevelopment index - living a long and healthy life, having
accessto education, and a decent standard of living. By looking
beyondincome deprivation, the HPI-1 represents a multi-dimensional
alternativeto the $1 a day (PPP US$) poverty measure.
The HPI-1 value for Ethiopia, 55.3, ranks 98th among 102
developingcountries for which the index has been calculated.
The HPI-1 measures severe deprivation in health by the
proportionof people who are not expected to survive age 40.
Education ismeasured by the adult illiteracy rate. And a decent
standard ofliving is measured by the unweighted average of people
withoutaccess to an improved water source and the proportion of
childrenunder age 5 who are underweight for their age. Table 2 shows
thevalues for these variables for Ethiopia and compares them to
othercountries. |
Figure 2:
 |
| Table 2: Selected indicators ofhuman
poverty for Ethiopia |
Human Poverty Index
(HPI-1) 2004 |
Probability of not survivingpast
age 40 (%) 2004 |
People without access to an
improved water source (%) 2004 |
Children underweight for age (%
ages 0-5) 2004 |
| 1. Uruguay (3.3) |
| 96. Guinea (52.0) |
| 97. Swaziland (52.5) |
| 98. Ethiopia
(55.3) |
| 99. Niger (56.4) |
| 100. Chad (57.9) | |
| 1. Hong Kong, China (SAR) (1.5) |
| 145. Mali (37.3) |
| 146. Burkina Faso (38.9) |
| 147. Ethiopia
(39.5) |
| 148. Niger (41.4) |
| 149. Uganda
(41.6) | |
| 1. Bulgaria (1) |
| 123. Cambodia (59) |
| 124. Papua New Guinea (61) |
| 125. Ethiopia
(78) | |
| 1. Chile (1) |
| 129. Timor-Leste (46) |
| 130. Yemen (46) |
| 131. Ethiopia
(47) |
| 132. India (47) |
| 133. Bangladesh
(48) | |
| 102. Mali (60.2) |
172. Swaziland (74.3) |
|
134. Nepal (48) |
|
Ethiopia in Human Development Report 2006
Ethiopia was mentioned in the Report in pages 1, 8, 12, 15, 22, 34, 36,
37, 44, 45, 46, 54, 56, 62, 87, 88, 102, 135, 156, 157, 158, 164, 174,
197, 206, 207, 208, 210, 266, 276,and 402.
| |