ደጀ ሰላም የማ/ቅዱሳን ናት በሚል የተለያዩ የተሐድሶ መናፍቃን ብሎጎች ሲጽፉ ከመቆየታቸውም በላይ ኢትዮጵያን ሪቪው ላይ ጽሑፋቸውን እስከማውጣት ደርሰዋል (ለማንበብ ይህንን ይጫኑ)። ለብልግናቸው መልስ መስጠት ባይገባንም “ማስረጃ” ብለው ያቀረቡትን ማታለያ ግን ዝም ብለን ልናልፈው አልፈቀድንም… [ሙሉውን ጽሁፍ ለማንበብ እዚህ ላይ ይጫኑ]
“ደጀ ሰላም” የማ/ቅዱሳን ናት በሚል ለተስተናገደ ጽሑፍ የተሰጠ ማስረጃዊ ምላሽ
EthiopianReview.com | May 24th, 20126 Responses to ““ደጀ ሰላም” የማ/ቅዱሳን ናት በሚል ለተስተናገደ ጽሑፍ የተሰጠ ማስረጃዊ ምላሽ”
We would like to hear your opinion.
Join Ethiopian Review's forum and post
your comments. Click here to join us.
If you are already a member, click here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
yes, it is a given . Dejeselam is definatly other side of MK. MK has two face one supporting weyane the other one is doing divition withen the dispara ortodox church. To do thire mission; they pretanding as if they are with Ethiopian people use dejeselam blog in north america.
my fellow Ethiopians do not be fulish MK is alarady cler their stand few month ago in Dejeselam Blog they are supporting EPRDF as a polatical parties. It is thier right to do so ,but what we sayin is dont play a game with dispera ethiopian whom they are aginest weyane.
I have one qustion to dejeselam blog;- If you dont support weyane whay you do not accept the legtemet Synod that strugling with the rest of ethiopian people? secondly whay alwys expline about aba powlos’s synod in your blog. Turdly you never post any comment in your blog that are not support the news you post. i can say mony things to profe it… for example MK is giveing a docment to Wayne about Waldeba suger kane project, the docment is supporting the project it was a vary cler indecation that dejeselam blog is covering for that by saying “under presher of the govement MK gives a study resurch about Waledeba” this is funny goverment didn’t aske any help from MK. Who the heke they are acting as a resurch consltant for Our church.
Finaly i have a cler massage to dejeslam OR Mk some of us knows exactly what your game is … to take over betkehent is unthinkeble. your stratagy is so dum you think nobody understand you we all do. the socondthing is YOU HAVE TO UNDERSAND YOU ARE ACCOUNTEBLE IN OUR CHURCH HISTORY DIVIDING THE CHURCH IN DISPARA COMMUNITY WE DO HAVE ALL THE DOCMENT. WE WILL PRESENT TO THE ETHIOPIAN PEOPLE AS THE FREDOM ARRIVE.
In other side thire good sides as well such as 1. helping the (abenet temhert bete)
2. fiting with some thadeso even though you labeling evry one as thadeso when they disagree with MK been tools of weyane.
3. Focasing the tradtional form of Ethiopian ortodox song (sint yareds way ).
Suggetion to MK mke up your mind join the Legetmet synod ‘Practise what you prich” obbay the canon law of the church.”accept abune merkorios as a legtment patriaric of ethiopia” irrase your self from been accounteble by history.
ውሾቹ ይጮሃሉ: ግመሎችም ይጋዛሉ:: ሙሉጊታ እግዚአብሂር የሰጠህን እድል ብትጠቀም ምን አለ:: አርፈህ ብትማር እንዲህ ያለም ስህተት አትሰራም:: ማህበር ቅዱሳን ለ20 አመት ተፈትኖ እዚህ የደርሰ ነው:: የኢትዮጵያ ህዝብም ቢተክርስቲያና ያለችበትን ችግር ተመልክቶ አደራ ሰጥቶታል:: የተሰጠውን አደራ መጠበቅ የማህበሩ ስራ ነው:: እውነትንም ሰለያዘ ይቀጥላል:: እባክህ ወንድሚ ወደ ልብህ ተመለስ ንሳህም ግባ:: የሰላምንም ድምጽ ትሰማታላህ::
Elias, ምን አለ ይህን ሙሉጌታ የሚባል እብድ ብሎክ ብታደርግ;
Mahbere kidusan has millions of members (most of them are highly educated). It does not hold any true in it for me to consider Mahbere kidusan is EPRDF supporter. Please lets not mix religion with politics for our personal agenda. When I read DN Mulugeta’s writings, it seems he has his own personal agenda.
I am wondering anyways. How come Ethiopian Review posted articles which are Pro Mahibere kidusan? The trend was completely different:ER has never posted any article which shows the truth from the side of Mahibere Kidusan. On the other hand however, one can find tonnes of articles posted on this website cursing and defaming Mahibere Kidusan. It seemed that the website was the unofficial site for Tehadisos.
It is good, Elias, you started to post the two sides of the story; the time is not late.
Why do u remove posts which speaks the truth.hours before there was an excellent comment posted as a response to the writer.but you have removedit.why?do that ean that it is not possible to comment against the author